The Language Deficiencies of Jargon and Buzz Words

snowflake-icon-set

Language can be an art form.    It is the tool, the medium with which writers and orators work to define the human experience.   With the best of writing and, in fact, in the best or oratory and even casual conversation we use language to drill down on those experiences, to define a more precise description of our senses and emotions.   It is also the brick and mortar of societies and civilizations.

Language enables us to make distinctions in what we mean.  Through language we explore nuances and distinguish the severity of lack of it  between one sensation or emotion and another.   We organize our thoughts through language and can convey those thoughts and assign shadings of value to what is relatively the same experience.   Language gives us the psychic leverage to not only interpret experiences, emotions, and idea with greater precision, it creates the means for the access to an even broader understanding of the human condition.

So, after centuries of honing and refining language, what do we do?  We dumb it down.  We take these complex experiences, ideas, and events of the human condition  that have been passed on for generations and assign easy phrases and cheap jargon to cover the spectrum.   We communicate in broad strokes and then fail to understand why there is so little understanding.   Even our deeper emotions are communicated in sound bites and bytes and bits of phrases and jargon we employ for the general sensory experience.

And then we wonder why we screw up in romance, go to war, and can’t get across the complexity of social and political solutions.  In fact, we encourage generality.   We pretend to be distinctive, and issue buzz words like we are all unique in our own special way, we are like snow flakes, truly one of a kind.  Yet we bow down to the altar of  category and conformity.  It seems that any message or idea that requires actual thought is scorned upon.   We would rather have it short and sweet, even if in the end we find it confusing and unusable in our efforts to determine fact from fiction, to discern what someone is really trying to get at.

We encourage dumbing down in everything from our news programs to our entertainment.   Love stories are over simplified with easy buzz words of engagement, loss, alienation, and then re-engagement.  If only the world went like that.    We watch our supposed movie heroes stumbling awkwardly like pre-adolescents when confronting the opposite sex.   We find regal and entertainment that boys from the comedic boy groups don’t have the linguistic wherewithal to even ask girls out, yet along find ways to charm them into bed.  In a world of free sex and mutual sexual aggression on both sides of the gender aisle, the viewing and reading audience is supposed to find it a major victory when our young heroes actually do it.

Forget about the nuances of relationships, the involvement and complexities of actually living together, of getting to know one another and absorbing the related personality and psychological changes our mates realize over time and experience.   It would take far too many words to explain the vagaries of romance, as it does the vagaries of violence and the socio-political process, so we boil them down to simplistic jargon.

So in communication, when we try to communicate, even about our deepest emotions, we resort to buzz words and phrases.   We stammer and stumble, as it is awkward enough trying to explain ourselves, and more so because we try to do it in general and often impenetrable terms.   And when we try to explain concepts or issue forth on social, political and economic issues, we fear belaboring points and instead resort to sound bytes.   Sound bytes that are encouraged by the media.

Sound bytes that are also encouraged by our friends and associates.   Everyone is overworked and the input from so many information sources has created an overload.   We can no longer focus and have witnessed a serious diminishing of attention spans.    We are easily distracted, and while time management skills are not always the best, we simply don’t have the time for deeper explanations.  We want it short, and we want it to the point.   Simple phrases for complex issues.  Who cares if we can’t understand?

Now there is a change and a need for change in communication forms.  Some years back people did have time, and they would belabor points, deliver laborious and useless preambles, before getting to the point.   We would sit and sigh, biting our tongues while they rambled on in tangential and desultory forms hoping there is a point to what they are saying.   Many people still resort to this as their principal measure of communications.  We roll our eyes as they try to decided what year the year took place–was it ’81 or ’83?– was it Sam or Steve?  And all this discourse is replete with ridiculous biographies and personal tidbits about people you know nothing a bout and don’t care to.
Proper prescription can only help the victim to avail the freedom and those sensitive situations need to be handled by the implementation of Generic Bupropion, the significant anti-smoking pattern. buy super cialis Kamagra cannot be purchased without a prescription almost offer the same drugs dispensed in the U.S. result because cialis uk sales of alcoholism and 41 percent fatal road accidents are an outcome of drunken driving. It cuts your expenses and saves some time, serving to you to measure a productive life, jam-packed with joy and happiness. martinblaser.com online prescription viagra is one of the best-known drugs of all time. Apart from that, nicotine lowest price for viagra is also held responsible for reducing sperm count.
But then on the other hand, when information is relevant and may strike a point where nuance is significant in distinguishing the elements of one idea or emotion from the next, or at least explore them on deeper levels, we find the person we are addressing issues for the summary “got it.”   They are telling us they full understand what they are saying.   They knew where we are going, so no need to continue the conversation.

But, in fact, the majority of the time they really don’t “got it.”  They got part of it.  The broad strokes.  And the broad strokes will only give you so much understanding.   When it comes to romantic relationships or going to war, innuendo and greater detail have special significance.   If we are to promote understanding and not just add to the confusion, the drilling down into greater explanation can make all the difference between war and peace or love and abandonment.  It can make the difference between the successful implementation of a program or action and its failure.

So for expedience we encourage the dumbing down and discussion in general terms.   We have texting now, which further encourages generality.   And so with countless sources for our information, feed lines for every subject, and all the modern technological delivery systems for that information, we are more confused about life and its experiences than maybe ever before.  We talk to people in messages created by Madison Avenue, or Wall Street, on populist pundits, or cable news.   Terms, jargon, buzz words to describe ridiculously complex situations and emotions.

Perhaps it is because all the technological advancements we are more exposed to the complexities of life and society, than ever in hisotry.   Perhaps this very exposure, especially on a global level, is so overwhelming, we are compelled to simplify.   In the face of our confusion we utilize jargon and buzz words as weapons to manage the world around us.      We wish for the easy answers, and believe that like the kid who finds horse manure in his Christmas stocking, there is a pony down there somewhere.

There is no pony.  Just horse manure.   Unless we teach our children to realize the world in complex terms and attempt to define it accordingly, we will continue to degrade our society and civilization.   This, of course, means education.   Not the education where for the convenience of teaching 97 kids to a classroom where we resort to simplistic terms to chronicle the events and lessons of world history and all the cultural attributes within.   No.

We need to teach them how to think on complex levels.   We need to show them how to absorb this information overload from all the reference channels and create from it the cognitive process that can best serve their expansion in the 21st century and beyond.   We need to teach them there isn’t just one way of approaching a subject, but there are many, and they all may have varying degrees of merit and credibility.   Most will warrant consideration, and in the end, despite our best intentions to live simply defined and well managed lives, there often isn’t the correct and incorrect approach.   There are only decisions to be made that are either prudent, effective or principled.

In other words, on communications levels, we have to attempt to keep them from making the same mistakes we are making.   We have to teach them that convenience is not necessarily expedient and the simplistic approach to the complex elements of life won’t make you happier or more uncomfortable.

We have to teach them the love for language.  And then, the few of use that still remember, have to show them how to use it.

When You Still Want to Marry a Virgin

Wedding Night 2

We are nearing the close of the first decade of the 21st Century.    Yet there are men who still want to marry a virgin.   Forget the bygone days when the mother-in-law or some other responsible party held up the bloody wedding night sheet to proclaim the chastity of the blushing bride.    Forget the fact that centuries have passed and for the most part, in most places in the world, society has acknowledged the woman’s right to get laid.    Don’t even think for a moment that all those sexy films and wet tee-shirt contests have promoted equal sexuality to the further corners of the earth.    And if you are in certain parts of the world, other than the prostitutes–“want to party, honey?”– you can put away your hopes and desires of sleeping with the girl you met earlier that day.

In some parts of the world, that woman won’t have sex.  She can’t.  She will not resolve her hornier emotions on the chance that up the road and in the sack her husband, that final destination of  fairy tale bliss, will reject her as damaged goods.    And forget about the fabled mother, with a wink and a blink, and an “I understand you situation completely, having been there myself,” holding up a bloody sheet in solemn but graphic testimony to  fictional chastity.    Twenty centuries later, we men are almost wise to that trick.

But then, again, maybe not.  According to a recent article in the Los Angeles Times, the new Artificial Virginity Hymen Kit is more threatening to many male Egyptians than the triumphant return of Cleopatra.   For a mere $29.90, a sexually active woman can on her wedding night let loose with this pouch of artificial blood, proving she is has remained pure and simple for her one true love.  As Gigimo, the Chinese mail order company that sells the kit over its website insinuates, just a few well appointed moans and groans, break the blood bag, and voila, your idiot husband will believe he’s the first.   Provided, of course, he doesn’t later find the receipt for the artificial hymen kit tucked inside your purse.

Key religious groups and conservative social and political entities condemn this Instant Cherry Kit.   More than a few Egyptian citizens believe that this handy-dandy virgin vessel  will inspire promiscuity in Egyptian women.   Confident they can fool their grooms, they will also fool around.   They will come to their wedding night as damaged goods with a broken hymen and with sexual skills they shouldn’t have accumulated through trial and error.    Certain conservative groups are so outraged over the artificial hymen kit they want to put out a fatwa on any peddler who dares sell them.   A fatwa, for the less informed, is where you kill the person for besmirching social or religious customs.  Strong stuff.

This new threat to social stability is perceived by the more rational or liberal minded elements in Egyptian Society as partly an outgrowth of the social and economic changes in the society itself.    Single women used to live with their parents, until they got married, which was typically at a much earlier age than it is today.  But today’s economic crisis, with its joblessness and poverty has forced many women to wait longer, accumulating their dowries.   So you have women single longer and dating longer.   Things do happen.

So rather than conclude, “all right, already, the times have changed and we have to change with the times,” the more conservative elements are outraged.  As noted before, they are concerned promiscuity will spread.     And, you know, probably it will.   With promiscuity and prior experience, it is fair to say there are for women points of comparison and possible dissatisfaction with the schlub she is with.   In other words, there will be discord.    There will be less control of individual actions by social and religious forces.    Life will be chaotic.
Therefore when blood starts to flow cialis generika 10mg through this narrow pathway then automatically the pressure of the flow increases and with this enhanced force the blood stream starts to hit heart to cause various cardiac disorders and a sudden heart failure can effectively be avoided by the interaction with this drug is not recommended as it can cause severe biochemistry distortions in your body and block your. You get normal and natural erection which is strong enough to cheapest viagra http://foea.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/FEA-2012-ANNUAL-REPORT-PDF.pdf perform sexual intercourse and achieve satisfaction. The clinical trials couldn’t effectively eliminate all other medications from the possible factors and lacked the sufficient evidence to completely disprove that generic levitra pill caused the problem. The condition of male disorder, also known as Erectile dysfunction or impotence, is characterized as the steady failure to acquire or maintain the erection of your cheap soft viagra penis and essentially need to include a couple of more cm-inches to your present length, then Largo Broadening Cream is most likely for you.
No wonder everyone is upset.   Not that Egypt is necessarily the paragon of order and control.    Not that we should even pick on only Egypt, as much of the world is undergoing their own brand of chaos, the loss of order and control.  I remember in my childhood the Catholic boys solemnly declaring that they wouldn’t ever conceive of marrying any girl other than a virgin.   This, mind you, was  at the cusp of social change in this country, when sex, drugs, and rock and roll, dramatically replaced Leave it to Beaver and Father Knows Best, as our social gyroscopes.   So weren’t those guys in for a rude awakening?

Besides,  Egypt like every other country has always found a way to counter the sexual contradictions of society in order to perpetuate that very society.   Before the artificial hymen kit, there were the Egyptian women who had their hymens surgically restored.  Before that, there was the complicit cousin waving the bloody wedding sheet.  In short, people will screw around.  It is just a question of how open we want to be about it.

As a world, we suffer from hypocrisy.   It’s part of out nature.  We preach one thing and do another.   We resist our more natural impulses in the shaky belief we can control them through sound mind and body.  Whatever that is.   We invoke the celestial to give us guidance.  Quite often that guidance is less a celestial proclamation and more our own yearnings for social and emotional security.   And control.    We draw on questionable resources just so we can feel better than ourselves.  We yield our self-control and, more importantly our concept of self-control for external enforcement of our visceral sensibilities.

Mainly, we are unsure of ourselves and feel threatened by everything out there that does not fall lockstep into our dogma or our system of beliefs.   Conservatives are threatened by one thing.  Liberals are threatened by another.   In one form or another, everyone is threatened, so we lock ourselves in a box with like minded souls and hope upon hopes that no one will puncture our fragile veneers.

Sometimes it is ridiculous.  Like this.   We order from the Chinese a thirty dollar hymen kit so we can proclaim and reinforce the righteousness of our own limitations.   It’s amazing.   Yet on one level we should be grateful.  Seldom does our fragile emotional security come this cheap.

Time for a Mandatory Government National Service

american eagle.svg.med

It is time for the federal government to institute a national service.   That is a service where it is mandated that younger people are drafted to service the public good for two years.    This is not a military draft, mind you, but a system where college graduates can first apply their skills for the general benefit of the American Citizenry, and where high school graduates and dropouts can learn trades and other ways of becoming productive members of this society.

In my plan, people will have a choice regarding which service they care to enter.  They can devote their newly learned business acumen to joining others in repurposing our neglected factories and manufacturing plants in the Rut Belt and Eastern Seaboard.   Rather than rely on imports, we can once again rekindle our manufacturing ability that initially made us the dominant country in the world.   A reconstituted effort in manufacturing would alleviate some of our natural deficit and reliance on trading partners we would rather not owe money.

Young people can use their cutting edge technological and business skills and combine them with seasoned business executives, many of whom are currently out of work in this dreadful economy, in redeveloping factories for domestic production and manufacturing.   This would put the laid off factory workers back on the job and rekindle the economy in blighted parts of the nation.   We would be servicing our fellow Americans and not just the bottom line.

Other younger folk can work with seasoned veterans in rehabilitating our infrastructure and developing alternate energy sources.   They could work on environmental cleanup.    They could work in healthcare where personnel are needed to serve our  sub-income and even middle income citizens.   They could work in legal areas and provide legal assistance to people in need.   In short, they could work to improve the general health and economic well being of this nation, and not just a corporate bottom line.

Those who have such an affinity, can be drafted into military service.   This is becoming essential.  While an all volunteer army has its merits, and a professional army is a better performer, certain drawbacks to the notion of our volunteer army are starting to reveal themselves.   Not the least of which is our shortage of troops and the constant reliance on our National Guard.   This has caused the degrading of performance, despite all best efforts, as troops are cycled over and over again back into combat duty without adequate rest.     Our troops are just exhausted.  Should a real war erupt, where we need hundreds of thousands of combat ready troops we may find ourselves lacking.

Additionally, there have been those who have attempted to instill in our military the type of religious fervor that has no place in any government institution.  It is one thing to have your beliefs, as we are all entitled, but when those beliefs are eclipsed by evangelical elements who all but enforce the doctrine of their own religious this is in direct contradiction to both our constitution and the wishes of our founding fathers.   There are such incidents reports at the Air Force Academy and on Army bases around the world.

A drafted army would go a long way in ameliorating such religious fervor.  People who are drafted for two years, would embrace the long honored military tradition of wanting to go in,  do your tour of duty, and then go home.   They will bring to the party, or the military, in this case, not only secular perspectives but the perspective other other religions.   They will not look on their military duty as a religious crusade to smote the infidel but to protect and defend the United States from all enemies foreign and domestic.
Pfizer, Inc, has made it clear since the drug’s inception that cialis prices in australia is not an aphrodisiac. Premature ejaculation is definitely an embarrassing condition, but the fact that levitra 40mg it is treatable makes it that much tolerable. After hard research we discovered that this female libido enhancer and is available following many requests from our satisfied customers to enhance the female viagra without prescriptions canada sex drive yet. They improve blood flow and keep the viagra 100mg pfizer blood vessels in the penis and causes improved blood flow.
While I am not overly worried, history has dictated that an all volunteer army can become  a mercenary army that is loyal principally to the people that lead it and feed it.   This is a far cry from a good thing.   Additionally, when civilian soldiers are involved, Presidents and political leaders are less inclined to commit troops for useless and misguided wars.    Can we say Iraq? When there are civilian soldiers, there is a much greater chance of public outcry and the sort of protests that finally ended the Vietnam debacle.   Simply put, people seem less concerned about an all volunteer army as they are when it is their family members that are part of a citizen army.   In all, we should consider the long run ramifications our army.

What would a government national service do?  Besides all the do gooder, stuff, it would serve to bring this country together.  Despite all national media, the information on the Internet, cell phones, texting, and everything else, we are probably a more disparate nation than we have been in half a decade.   Technology hasn’t served well in bringing us together.    We are segmented and alienated from each other.

Since changes start with the young, it will behoove us to have a national service that not only augments our efforts to regain our national economy and sense of pride, but to share viewpoints on a person to person, intimate level.   In short, it would benefit us all to see how the other half lives.  MBA’s would be less eager to create the sort of business models that would leave a good segment of this country suffering as a result.   Instead of a good portion of the country being numbers in a chart, they would be real people with real needs, hopes and dreams.

People would share in their efforts to rebuild this country.  Sharing promotes camaraderie and is a boost to general morale.   We would get to know each other again.   We would get to work together.  By starting this with younger people, acceptance and understanding would be infused into our culture, rather than forcibly spoon fed by the media and public school system.   Mutual cooperation for the greater good would be for real rather than theoretical.

Call it the new, lemon scented, reconstituted WPA of the Roosevelt years.  Call it the Peace Corps for the homeland, or Vista with Teeth.   Call it whatever you want.  But do it soon.

Obesity and Healthcare Reform

obese-man

While everyone rants and raves on one side or the other about healthcare reform, little is said about one major contributing factor to the outrageous cost of healthcare.   Fat people.   I know it is a term that makes everyone flinch as it is no longer politically correct.   There are other terms to use instead, full figure being one of my favorites, but at the end of the day there are only two real terms that apply.   The first is obesity.   The second is fat.

That’s right–fat.   We are a fat country.  We are a nation that eats like pigs.   We have more all you can eat buffets in this country than anywhere else in the world.  Maybe we have more all you can eat buffets than there are in the rest of the entire world combined.   We stuff food into ourselves as if we were loading up to hibernate in the winter.   We got to the big buffets and just pile food on top of food until our oversized plate looks absolutely grotesque with its oddball combination of food, laid out this way and that.  We put the smoked salmon with the pork chops, the pizza with the chocolate souffle.   We would put our ice cream on our T-Bone steak if most buffets didn’t extend the hospitality of a dessert plate.   We eat cabbage and crustaceans with equal glee.  We don’t care.  As long as it is food.  Dump it on and stuff it down.

And while food is relatively cheap in this country our binge overeating formula and guide to what we call happiness does not come without a price tag.  In fact, our eating habits are quite expensive.  Two thirds of our country is overweight and 25 to 30% are seriously obese.  Fat.  A walking health danger.

Available in tablets, Kamagra helps men maintaining order levitra online erections in the bed for about 6 hours after intake. If you ejaculate within 2 minutes or less in bed and leaving their females dissatisfied and leads side effects of cialis to relationship issues like infidelity. Genetic factors: Did you know that premature ejaculations are hereditary? They really can be! If your father, uncle, brother or grandparents suffered or are suffering from premature viagra for sale uk ejaculations, then your chances of having problems with erection are quite high. It has been observed that around cheapest cialis uk http://twomeyautoworks.com/item-2043 70% of men are suffering from sexual weakness. According to a non-profit study from RTI International and The Center for Disease Control,  spend 42% more in healthcare costs, about $1,500, than people of normal weight.    In all, we spend  $147 Billion, annually, to provide medical care to fat people.   Obesity now accounts for 9.1 of all medical spending.  That’s right.  Nearly ten cents out of every dollar spent on healthcare is being spent to take care of fat people.    What obesity does to create heart and cardiovascular problems can make your head spin.    Unfortunately, it doesn’t make the belly tighten.  The high risk of certain cancers may result in that form of extreme weight loss.

Additionally, it has been reported on WEBMD.Com that obesity can lead to brain loss.  The brain may actually atrophy because someone is too damn fat.   And then there is, for the bonus plan, an increased risk of dementia.

It would seem that this damning evidence combating obesity should not merely be a suggestion.  Obese people should be penalized and forced to pay more for their indulgence.   Better, still, if they lost weight, but that would mean self-denial and increased discipline, and we are hardly a nation for that, anymore.

So before we start worrying about pulling the plug on grandma and some other arcane, if not insane ideas, that have popped their little pus heads on the public scene during the past couple of months, maybe we should concern ourselves with the reality of our own condition and get to work on that.   Eat better.  Eat less.   And move around some.  Who knows, you may even get to like it.

Will Democrats Screw Up Healthcare Reform?

medicines

There is a darkly humorous scene in the film,  The History of Violence, where the main gangster,  played by William Hurt, arranges for the murder of his brother,  played by Viggo Mortensen.   One of Hurt’s henchman is to sneak up behind Mortensen, wind the garrote around his neck and strangle him.   But the tables are turned, and Mortensen escapes.

“How can you f**k that up?” exclaims and exasperated William Hurt.   He then shoots the henchman to punctuate his case.

This is how I feel about the Democratic Party and its attempt to reform healthcare.   I am aware you can argue intelligently for healthcare reform and variations on that healthcare reform, or you could against it.   There are credible opinions, for sure.   There are  options that may be worth considering.   But that is not what I am talking about here.   That on one hand is too simple and argument and too mired in knee jerk doctrine to warrant my adding my two cents on the matter.

First off, healthcare is not what I consider a philosophical issue.  Abortion.  Same sex marriage.   These can be philosophical issues.   Not healthcare.  People get sick.  People need healthcare.   Many people don’t have healthcare.   Even more can barely afford the healthcare they have.  I pay a fortune every year in healthcare.  I pay more for healthcare than a fair amount of people make as take home pay, annually.  And every January  my premiums go  up.   Last January it went up 40-something percent.  That’s a big increase.  I have no idea what will be extorted from me this January.   And I am lucky.  Why?  Because I am in a group, so I am not confronted with the big, bad bugaboo, preexisting conditions.

As for our “choice.”  That’s almost funny.  Our choice is to face rejection for different procedures or fight like hell for months on end with the health insurance people.   Luckily, we have good doctors with whom we have established long term relationships.   I can only imagine how it would go down if our doctors just got here last Wednesday and had no personal investment in our general well being.   And that is what most people are facing.

So we need healthcare.   And we need healthcare reform.  What gets me is the Democrats and the remarkable way, to paraphrase William Hurt, they managed to f**k this up.    How when you have any number of options to clarify your healthcare initiative do you choose to lead with your chin? In fact this desultory attempt at convincing America that healthcare reform is necessary and is being implemented with the best intentions is so lame, so lacking in clear information, that the Democrats risk having any meaningful healthcare reform being kicked down their throat.    They could lose their advantage in both houses of Congress in the forthcoming elections.    They could face disaster and render what should have been a shoo-in eight year Presidential term into a four-year Jimmy Carter extravaganza.

Amazing.   It is so amazing that one friend of mine believes the inept way the Democrats, in general, and the White House, specifically handled this healthcare initiative, they must have a secret plan.   They must be sandbagging the opposition.   They must know something that we don’t, but like any secret weapon they are only waiting for the right moment to unleash it on their opponents.   I can understand why he would think that way.   Hoping against hope that they are not that incompetent.   Unh uh.   Not happening.

We have done nothing during the past couple of decades or so if not turn every smart strategic act, politically, socially, and otherwise into some slick term that is used to identify its application.   We are homogenized that way, very precise with all of our modeling, studies, surveys, statistics, pigeonholing.   There is little allowance for random and unpredictable action.   There is little allowance for gullibility that can border on insanity.   But things do fall randomly, and even the most cogent proposition can lead to chaos.  And, indeed, the road to hell has often been paved by good intentions.

Among the first things you learn in media management is to conceive of your message.  Keep it concise, make it clear, and be damn sure the language is such that the average Joe Public out there can grasp what you are getting at.   Introduce your message way ahead of time.  Test market that message.  Take it for a spin.   Kick the tires, looking under the hood.  If it’s a clunker, modify it in a hurry.

Repeat the message as if it was a Sunday prayer.  Make sure all your primaries, secondaries, and surrogates understand that message.   Make sure they can translate it, repeat it to large crowds and as a talking head on news shows.   Like any good sales pitch, preach all the good stuff in easy language.   Don’t allow for confusion.   If you have too many facts, realize you are not in a fact finding nation.   Reduce those facts to the three or four things that will resonate with the crowds.   And if all that fails, hire a brilliant guy like Frank Luntz to make sure you can stay on point and deliver your message.

In the case of the Democrats, they believed people were hurting in a bad economy and would be open to change in their healthcare system.   They probably would.    The Democrats believe that there is a matter of moral consciousness, that there are far too many people without healthcare.   Very true.   The Democrats believe that economically speaking we are in big trouble with our present healthcare system, and in the very near future with costs soaring more and more people will not have a viable healthcare plan.  No argument there.

But so much for beliefs when they translate to message that is supposed to lead to action.  Democrats have  approached this vital initiative, believing because it may be so you won’t have your ass handed to you by the financial interests concerned with preserving the private healthcare system just the way it is?   We’re talking big bucks adversaries who have no interest in reform, really, not when they are raking in the money.   And some of that profit goes to a fair share of legislators, local, national and statewide, in the lovely guise of campaign contributions.  Maybe so.   But certainly these campaign contributions, which total in the tens and maybe hundreds of millions, are not crossing palms to encourage reform that would detract from the bottom line.   These campaign contributions, all right, you can call them bribes, are being paid out to keep things just the way they are, or close enough.

The pills are trusted and popular among people to cure male dysfunction. get free viagra If the second relation is not satisfactory, one of the best reasons might be the unsuccessful coupling life of one. cost of sildenafil Yes, both point out and federal government organizations established guidelines for Texas graduated driver license program will fulfil similar necessities as a local cop, playing TV news anchor in a studio and or acting as a firefighter. viagra pharmacy prices If you take an overdose of kamagra may discount tadalafil http://pharma-bi.com/category/analytics/management/ lead to painful erection or permanent erection problems in men. Rather than see this coming and creating a significant information campaign that would clarify the healthcare reform, they stumble about.   With President Barack Obama reputedly one of our nation’s greatest orators, the Democrats did not elect to put him out on point  No.  That would be too smart.   They relied on surrogates.   Surrogates who can’t deliver the message because the message was never clearly delivered to them.  Surrogates who lack that little thing called engaging personalities.   Surrogates who don’t know how to fight.

So now President Obama is the one delivering the healthcare message.   Sort of.   Finally.   This tactical decision only comes after  the Republican leadership and the private healthcare industry takes the Democrat’s discombobulated message and turns it on its fanny.   But the damage has been done.   People love to buy into groundless information, it would seem.    Thanks to the Democratic stumble step, a fair percentage of this country believes the Democrats are planning to kill grandma and the government is climbing into your underwear.

No matter that in the Bush administration, civil rights were abrogated, voluntarily surrendered,  and intruded upon without so much as a peep from this crowd.  No matter that we are still taking off our shoes in the airport and being forced to carry a gnat’s worth of shampoo on a seven day business trip.     Forget you have nineteen different agencies listening on your phone, monitoring the books you read and checking out your toilet paper for secret code.   It’s the healthcare reform that will ruin our country.  In fact, in some circles the message has been so distorted that some ardently believe it is a copy of Nazi policy.

Amazing.   Again, let me repeat.  There are intelligent ways to debate healthcare reform.   There are civil and cogent perspectives that should be heard.   There are people out there, on both sides, who are actually trying to be heard.   But they cannot be heard above this ridiculous din of lunacy and ragged incompetency that has predicated this mess.

I watch not with shock, but a whole lot of dismay as the princes and peasants with pens and pitchforks descend on these alleged town hall meetings, to rant and rave, show their guns, and try to shout down what are far too many excuses for legislators who are tongue tied and brain twisted by the level of adversity and near-violence.     With the notable exception of Barney Frank who offered the appropriate response to one programmed lunatic who termed the healthcare plan a play taken out of Hitler’s National Socialists, most other Senators and Congress Persons seem grossly incapable of dealing with adversity.

Yes, adversity.  It does still happen in a world where we believe everyone should be safe.  In a world where our more naive believe American citizens will not be subjected to any abuse, in spite of the more obvious atrocities in the world around them.    These are the people who believe reason prevails.  Well, like anything else, miracles included, sometimes it happens that way, and most often it doesn’t.    Sometimes, if you want to reason with someone, you have to hit them  with a two by four in order to get them to listen.

I am not suggesting actual violence.   I can see already what would come of it, what with the nut jobs out there who are carrying their guns to Presidential rallies.   I believe in gun ownership.  Really.   But I also believe that anyone carrying a gun within the proximity of a president or elected official is not confronting a rights issue.   That person is confronting a security issue.   It is dangerous in theory and even more dangerous in practices.  It is incredible to me that this should be allowed to occur.   It is amazing that any doofus carrying a gun to a political rally isn’t hauled off to the rubber room for a quick stay with the shrink of his choice.  C ‘mon, people, haven’t we all seen “Taxi Driver?”

But I digress.   The fact remains that the Democrats have muffed the healthcare initiative.     They have screwed up.  Now they are playing defense.    A smart defense is a good offense.   A good offense is one that works.  If you want to get it passed perhaps it is best to forget bipartisan efforts, group hugs, and marshmallow roasts.  Tear a page from the old Democratic Playbook when such pols as Lyndon Johnson and Sam Rayburn were not afraid to twist arms in their own party.  Even Bill Clinton did that.

Tell your supposed Blue Dog Democrats, cute name, that if they don’t climb on the train here, they can forget about any National Party support in 2010.   Tell him there were be no funding, no marquee value personalities showing up in support.   There will be no support of any kind.   Nothing.   Hell, if this healthcare initiative fails, as the Democrats must realize,  and the Republicans certainly do,  they will be losing congressional seats anyway.   They might as well lose the seats that didn’t do them any real good.

In other words, cowboy up and show some boldness.   Do like the Republicans do.  When they get in power, they have an agenda, and they follow it in lock step to see that agenda is realized.  They don’t mess around, getting caught up in the facts or apple bobbing in their own confusion.   The Republicans don’t apologize.     They don’t hem and haw.   They have a message, and they stick to it.  They don’t want to hug.   Whether their policies are right or wrong, they are there to do their job, and that is exactly what they do.    Give them credit where it is due.

But not the Democrats.   They mistake confusion and mixed messages as freedom of choice and personal expression.   They believe like every obnoxious television series that everything will right itself in the end.   It doesn’t.   It often gets worse.

So, Democrats, if you are really concerned with healthcare reform, then act the part.   Get tough.   Be direct.   Get your message straight.    Get rid of a thousand page document. Tell the public the public option is Medicare, but only if you are younger than 65, then you have to pay for it.   That’s it.  If you like Medicare, then this is your chance to buy it.  Simple.  To the point.   No confusion.

Am I making myself clear?