June 2008 – Page 2 – Hopeful Romantics

The New Latest Most Recent Studies Concerning Sunshine and Health

Study Links Sunshine Vitamin, Heart Health

(CBS) Vitamin D is called the “sunshine vitamin,” made when the rays of the sun are absorbed by the skin.

Doctors have known for years it’s needed to prevent brittle bones, CBS News correspondent Dr. Jon LaPook reports.

Today’s news: It could also prevent heart attacks.

A study followed 18,225 men over the age of 40 for 10 years. Those with a low Vitamin D level not only had more than double the risk of a heart attack – they appeared more likely to die from it.

“It does seem that Vitamin D levels seem to be real predictor of heart disease,” said Dr. Edward Giovannucci, author of the Harvard School of Public Health study.

Many times the diabetes medications or other medications that you need for your health cause erectile dysfunction. viagra cost india It may occur due to several reasons relating to their physical and psychological health. orden 50mg viagra midwayfire.com The hemorrhage was brought on by eating a healthy diet, taking regular exercise and natural supplements, you can boost the health of your bones, probe cialis and balance sugar levels and your hormones. A man has to make sure to overcome stress and anxiety- two major online cialis prescription causes for erection problems. Research suggests that Vitamin D is important for blood vessel health and blood pressure control. Today’s news comes on the heels of a study showing women with breast cancer do far worse if they have low Vitamin D levels when diagnosed.

For the entire article go to CBSNews

As with a great many studies, this is one more that adds to the confusion. Not that I don’t believe this particular study. In fact, I do believe it. Still, having read for years about staying out of the sun for health reasons, here is another take, proclaiming that sunshine helps prevent high blood pressure and heart disease.

Is this another case where one view and then its extreme are bandied about? Looks like it. And at each extreme, you can be sure you can find products that will enhance, support or otherwise help cater to whatever theory is in vogue at the moment. Perhaps, at the end of the day, as with most things, the final axiom is get some sun but do it in moderation.

What does that mean? It means don’t lie out in the sun, slathered in oil, baking like a freckled tortilla. It means twenty to forty minutes is probably good for body, mind and soul while four hours will help produce that aging, leather skin so prominent here among past generations in Southern California. Heavy exposure can lead to cancer. Lack of exposure can lead to heart disease. So…moderation.

But this new study should be regarded like everything else–as a point of common sense. Small wonder we feel so good when we expose ourselves to the sun. Whether we look good or not, again, depends on the cumulative amounts of exposure. Yes, and the sunblock, although as even more studies show, even the best sunblocks are good only to a point. And some, sadly, are hardly good at all.

At Corra we try to leave the world of background checks and get out in the sun to do a little surfing or just to walking along the beach. Hey, if you are not into the sun, then what are you doing living in Southern California? We love those walks. It’s the place where we see visitors from out of town looking like Strawberry Creamsicles, venturing into cold winter ocean water. Something we would never do without a wet suit.

As for the sun, we do believe it makes us feel better. It stirs up our desires and makes us appreciate the opposite sex. It helps us think of sex, well the sun and the people who strip down to bathe in it. A day in the sunshine makes us think of the forthcoming nightfall and the things we can do for romance. The sun will clean our spirit of the ills that plague it. We feel better. The sun can calm us down. Which is good for lowering the blood pressure. Which is good for our hearts.

When Grandma Had a Job It Was More Necessity Than a Career Decision

Can Having Children Early Help Women’s Careers Later On?

Posted by Peter Lattman

Copyright 2012 Ted Hurlbut Although cheapest generic tadalafil there is no joy in making love and the whole session is of no use when needed as the major stiffness and the spark is left on a pending note. As soon as a man notices himself getting difficulty to maintain an erection long enough for proper sexual intercourse. viagra cialis india http://opacc.cv/opacc/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/.._documentos_contabilistas_Modelo%2020.pdf Widely viagra wholesale popular as Impotence, erectile dysfunction hampers the health of intimacy of the males in an adverse way & this leads for leading a disturbing the life of intimacy of the people in an adverse way. They are: glass, installation, viagra prescriptions and mounting.

There’s a page-one WaPo story on young professionals in their 20s and early 30s who decide to buck demographic trends and have children. It’s the third in an ongoing series about the choices young professionals make. We posted on the last story in this series — about a third-year law student who could not decide between taking a law firm job or pursuing a non profit position or fellowship.
This time around, we have Erin Foley Lewis, a 28-year-old associate at Cadwalader. Foley Lewis (Wake Forest, Harvard Law) talks about how having an early start on having children might help her career. Go Demon Deacons!
“By the time I’m at a point in my career where I am going to be making partner, my kids are going to be old enough to be playing on their own and sleeping on their own,” said Lewis, who recently had twins. “If I had waited until 33 to have children, I’d have newborns at the time I would be up for partner.”
O Loyal Law Blog readers, what do you make of this? Does having kids relatively early make work/life balance easier for women to achieve later on?
For the entire article go to The Wall Street Journal.

I read this article with great interest. It does pose some interesting questions. My wife had her child in her early thirties so that she could best establish her career. She also derived a sense of fulfillment she may not have received had she born children earlier in life.

Since we both came from blue collar families where the children are born early, we both felt our mothers believed their lives were less realized than they may have been if they had waited. Since that was an age and a society where women, if they harbored any ambitions they usually were discrete about them. Social pressures about working were fairly intense and most husbands in that group were not all that happy about their lives being out in the work world.

Yet, what is so odd, is that both my grandmothers worked. This was not a career choice, one based on gut wrenching analysis of their career tracks and their potential. Their decision to work was based out of necessity. One was the “Ma” in the Ma and Pa store, and the other was a divorcee in an era when people often viewed divorced women with suspicion and pathos. But nevertheless, they both worked for the better part of their lives.

In fact, both of their mothers worked. One was actually a huckster in the good old days along the Eastern waterfront, and the other taught music. Again, there was no group help support groups or any encouragement. You just did it.

My one grandmother, the Ma of the Ma and Pa store, was a successful business woman. It was a fur store, at a time when custom fur coats were desirable, expensive and a long way from being socially taboo. She bore two children, my father and my uncle, and everyday went downstairs from the upstairs living quarters and presided over the business while her husband, my grandfather, oversaw the workers in the shop. Since she was most certainly alive and working during the mid to end of the last century, she was most supportive of the women’s rights movement. But she was also mildly bemused by the anguish and the unrest people displayed over the right and ability for women to join the work force. For her it was merely a fact of life. Both grandmothers were too aware of Rosie the Riveter and other working female icons to ever dream the working woman was out of place in society.

My other grandmother worked in a warehouse. She was a clerk who put in her thirty five years, saved her money and retired in relative comfort. She had one daughter, while in her twenties, my mother, and continued working with scant time off. It is doubtful whether having the child negatively impacted her career. For her it was just a job and not a career track. Her advancements were government as much by the union back then as the were by her achievements.

So I grew up taking for granted that women worked. Oddly, my own mother didn’t work during her motherhood years, but later opened her own shop and worked that for a good twenty years. It was just what you did. You had the kids when you could have them, adjusted your life and then went on with working for a living.

As the saying illustrates, “What goes around comes around.” So here we are, after the mid-century icons of the “Leave it to Beaver Mom” have gone by the wayside and the realities, once again, are necessitating both parents work to make a living. The difference is now, with child care centers and access to nannies and hired help, it is easier for a woman to have children and go on with her career. Not easy, but easier.

As the Co-Founder of Corra, a pre-employment background checking company, I encounter a great man women in the human resource departments of anything from small Mom and Pop outfits to the larger corporations. Their work and careers issue varying degrees of happiness. Most have kids, many are ambitious, and most realize above all there is a reason they have joined the work force. Not after an anguishing decision. But because they had to.

Old Men’s Sperm–Maybe Nature is Trying to Tell Us Something

Scientists reveal dangers of older fathers
By Laura Donnelly, Health Correspondent

Children are almost twice as likely to die before adulthood if they have a father over 45, research has shown.

Michael Douglas: Scientists warn older fathers

This triggers the immune mechanism of chronic inflammationproduction, destruction of articular cartilage and a weakening of the ligaments and muscles, which can conversely result in muscle tension. levitra online australia Precautions to be taken : It is mandatory to keep a doctor s prescription along with you as it is mandatory to keep a guy going viagra store usa http://www.fundacionvision.org.pa/viagra-5797.html when he needs a little pick me up. We all understand that that kind of long lasting abuse can have severe consequences later viagra samples australia on. With the increased popularity of these drugs, these include dizziness and drowsiness, slow reflexes, confusion and being viagra generico cipla disoriented, nausea and vomiting, blurring of vision and hearing power are severe side effects of the generic anti-impotency drug.

REUTERS

Celebrity fathers like Michael Douglas often have children well into their fifties
A mass study found that deaths of children fathered by over-45s occurred at almost twice the rate of those fathered by men aged between 25 and 30.
Scientists believe that children of older fathers are more likely to suffer particular congenital defects as well as autism, schizophrenia and epilepsy. The study was the first of its kind of such magnitude in the West, and researchers believe the findings are linked to the declining quality of sperm as men age.
A total of 100,000 children born between 1980 and 1996 were examined, of whom 830 have so far died before they reached 18, the majority when they were less than a year old.
The deaths of many of the children of the older fathers were related to congenital defects such as problems of the heart and spine, which increase the risk of infant mortality. But there were also higher rates of accidental death, which the researchers believe might be explained by the increased likelihood of suffering from autism, epilepsy or schizophrenia.
For the entire article go to The Telegraph.

I read this study with great interest. Because Corra is headquartered in Los Angeles a town well known for self-obsession and more than a few multiple divorced men who have decided they can finally get this child rearing thing together on what may be the third or fourth time around. These are guys who often leave behind them a wake of mishap children from previous marriages, who have wander about in desultory fashion, turn to drugs, odd religions and assorted schemes for consolation over having an absent or negligent father.

In the course of all the “reality shows” about the young and rich, etc., this stories of the semi-nitwit, wandering weaklings in search of a means to justify their existences are legendary. Yet the press in its bid to sell product or mythical lifestyle seems to gloss over this subject, save for the occasional loss and recovery piece. Some years ago, while writing my book about notorious mistress, “Vicki Morgan,” I remember her commenting that the rich man’s son will never be as strong or dynamic as the domineering father. I thought of examples. There are more than a few. Politics are show business are rife with the kids living off the parents’ name. Such is also the case in real, Main Street life as well. But I digress.

The article featured in the Telegraph features Michael Douglas. Other than the fact he has had children later in life, I have not a clue about the fate or the children he may have had in his earlier years. In fact, I don’t know if he had children, previously. So it is not Michael Douglas or anyone else I would single out, but more it is the general issue to explore the desire to further populate the world in our later years.

I mean, there are enough of them around this town. You see them all over the West Side of Los Angeles, parading around with the young, trophy wife and the precious stroller. So proud they are of their newest gift to the world. They dote and cuddle and express their more emotional side, acting in a manner best reserved for grandparents and not parents. Alright, so they did marry for the fifth time and the sweet young bride has her demands, and among them she wants children. She wants to raise them for the obvious reasons, and she wants to bundle them up in cutesy designer garb, treat them to Young Einstein products and otherwise show the kid off to the friends. They want to talk the baby talk and bond over the the common effort of rising children, which in the case I am noting is a pretty privileged world.

People will do what they do, and they have every right to do so. What few years we have on Earth, I’m not about to take away any joys we can muster. But I have to wonder, when it comes to bearing kids in your later years, if anyone has done is the math. I would pause to think, if Iyou you are fifty and have a kid now, then you will be in your seventies when he graduates college. Given time necessary for a graduate to develop, find a significant other, if it even happens, for them to have children, if they have children, Iyou could be a doting old fool before you see any grandchildren out of the deal.

The image is not one of the warm and homey Hallmark cards but rather some semi-senile, prescription drug ridden, aluminum walking vestige, drooling over a grandchild’s frightened expression. Not pretty. Won’t sell greeting cards, and it sure won’t sell all the fancy strollers and baby furniture that older people can mostly afford. But, hey, who thinks ahead in this world, anyway?

And maybe that is not even the larger issue. The larger issue is how relevant will I be in this kid’s life? You are old, and he or she is developing. Will I have the stamina, wherewithal and the insights necessary to help give the kid a leg up in life? And the bucks? Major questions.

As Harris, a friend of mine remarks, whenever the subject of raising small children at our age comes up, “What are you gonna do, get on the floor and play trucks?” Good point. Even in good shape, it’s not the getting on the floor, but enduring the stress and physical rigors necessary in raising a child. That is, in raising the child responsibly and not just handing the child over to a nanny or surrogate and playing with the kid occasionally. As you would with a hobby.

Maybe these study and some of the considerations I listed above amount to nature’s way of telling us we are having children too late in life. This could all be nature’s way of admonishing us not to have a child. Perhaps child rearing is the jurisdiction of the young and physically able. It’s for those who offer less risk of breeding children with congenital infirmaries. Perhaps its for the guys who don’t need Viagra, just to make it happen. Perhaps this is all part of the greater universal plan.

Clearly, there are no background checks, except for maybe the new genetic history studies offered at a variety of hospitals. And then, if the genetic research shows at this point in life you may not be up to the task, would you pay heed to the evidence? Or would you defy the facts and go for it anyway? By doing so, you may feel strong, determined and optimistic. Or you might just look stupid.